krpalmer: (Default)
While I’d been keeping track of news about the next Artemis mission to the moon (including spotting a report its rocket’s first stage is being put together), the pre-announcement its crew would be announced today was a bit of a surprise. I must have been supposing that would happen a little further into the week. In any case, I’d known the people to be launched inside an Orion capsule this time would include a Canadian astronaut. The choice happened to be on the TV at work tuned to the news channel when I was walking past it, and I took a brief further note of the small ceremony of the announcement.

After hopes over the years of “a grander trip into space than what we get these days” (which, in not being what it once was, “isn’t good enough” for a vocal faction), I’m conscious this announcement is at once a bit more concrete than some plans of the past and still not the accomplishment itself. Beyond it, accomplishing more than the loop of Artemis II around the moon and landing on it will require another spacecraft not built yet. If there are to be reports about the training of the crew (the three American astronauts have been in space before, but Jeremy Hansen hasn’t yet) over the number of months ahead, that’ll be something more to look for.
krpalmer: (Default)
Artemis I had launched at an hour not compatible with going to work the next day for me, but with advance forecasts of the splashdown time in hand I was able to tune into the official live stream while the capsule that was all that was left of the rocket launched into the night weeks before was dipping in and out of “re-entry blackout.” It turned out that when it wasn’t blacked out it was able to send video back, and I was able to see the Earth shifting from a near-orbital viewpoint to a merely high-altitude perspective and then see the parachutes opening. The splashdown was well within range of external cameras, although I’d noticed an earlier shot of the deck of the recovery ship where the horizon was bobbing back and forth quite a bit.

It was something just to contemplate Artemis I being out in space, and tempting to suppose the moon feeling a bit closer. At the same time, I’m conscious that Artemis II, which is supposed to have people on board for a different trajectory around the moon, will be a matter of finishing another rocket, but actually landing on the moon will take a lander and a launch vehicle that haven’t been built yet. With the current plans for SpaceX to supply both, I can imagine their completion will encourage the calls to retire the Space Launch System rocket and Orion capsule, honourably or otherwise, even before getting to the plans for somebody rich and their invited artists to ride the basis for that lander around the moon.
krpalmer: (Default)
Last night the sky was clear, and glancing out my rear window I happened to see a waxing moon rising. My mind did jump to the thought that Artemis I was somewhere out there as well, closing in for its second close pass. Today I happened to see a news item about the capsule completing that pass in my RSS reader; I went to the “official mission weblog” again only to not find that update, so I traced down the news item and found a picture showing something larger than “a small ball in the black void.” The mission is on its way back to Earth, but again this will take more than the familiar three days of the 1960s.
krpalmer: (snoopy)
In keeping track of the flight of Artemis I, I took note of the latest pictures from the cameras mounted outside the capsule catching sight of the Earth and moon close together (with the moon looking bigger than the Earth), but knew it would be leaving its distant retrograde orbit soon for the next leg of its journey. Checking the NASA site today, I saw confirmation that had happened. I’m now awaiting another close pass by the moon on the way back to Earth, which is still over a week away. Along with the sights from outside, I have noticed the capsule is equipped with coloured lighting inside, which might be peculiar for passengers. The Snoopy doll on board shouldn’t care, but I have sorted out it’s on a short leash, which at least lets me use a post icon in a different mood than it’s been stuck with before.
krpalmer: (Default)
Trying to keep up with the flight of Artemis I, I was aware that after making a close pass of the moon it would take a while to drop into the distant retrograde orbit that was the next part of the mission. As this week wore on I did start picking up that the small “CubeSats” packed into the top of the discarded second stage haven’t all managed to contact the Earth. After work today, though, I did find a report the capsule has entered its new orbit. While I did wonder what math I’d have to work out to understand just how big the moon (and the Earth itself) would look in that orbit, the online photo album I’ve been checking has posted a few indicative pictures. I’m aware in any case the capsule’s not going to stay there for a full circuit before dropping back towards the moon and circling back to Earth.
krpalmer: (Default)
Artemis I spent longer coasting out to the moon than the three days familiar enough from the 1960s, but I supposed this had something to do with the special distant retrograde orbit it’s going to enter and recalled more recent moon probes had taken their own time getting there. During the outward voyage I did catch up on some archived video, and noticed a press conference where someone mentioned the stuffed Snoopy placed in the capsule to float around in free-fall had been spotted but it would take a little while for the picture of that to be released. That kept me checking an online photo album. When a new picture of the capsule interior did show up I managed to spot the orange-suited Snoopy without too much trouble, noting how he didn’t have a bubble helmet on like other pieces of merchandising I’ve seen but wondering if there’d been concern that plastic might break. Then, though, I went back to the previous in-capsule picture and managed to spot the doll in somewhat worse lighting but about the same place.

Just as I was getting to work this morning Artemis ignited its rocket engine on our far side of the moon to begin entering its orbit; I was able to find an official report of its safe emergence from behind the moon. Further reports did happen to mention the Snoopy doll; just as I’d been wondering about the other stuffed figure on board I saw an explanation Shaun the sheep is strapped in.
krpalmer: (Default)
In the fullness of time designs turned into hardware and that hardware was rolled out to the launch pad, and I did start thinking a bit more about the impending first launch of the “Artemis Program.” I was conscious of the absolute contempt directed by a certain number of writers and commentators towards the “Space Launch System” rocket as put together to keep people who’d worked on the space shuttles employed. It’s possible, though, that my “sympathy towards the put-upon” set in towards NASA back when my suspicions that “fandoms” aren’t about “enjoying a story” only had Starlog letter pages glanced at from magazine racks to go on.
The days roll on )
krpalmer: (Default)
When I posted about the first pictures from the JWST for the sake of posting something here, I did mention an impression the infrared telescope was too sensitive to be aimed at the large outer planets. Just a few days later, though, I was taking another look at the NASA site and saw an item the telescope had taken pictures of Jupiter, offering different perspectives from the way it’s normally presented but not burning anything out. It’s kind of nice to have an impression corrected so quickly this way.
krpalmer: (Default)
After noting its launch and steps in its unfolding here, I let the final checkout process of the JWST stay at the back of my mind. Eventually, though, news built up that the first images were imminent. The very first of them got on the front page of my newspaper this morning, distant galaxies gravitationally lensed around closer ones. What followed in translations from the infrared to palettes of red and blue were also intriguing, although my impression is that this space telescope can’t be used to keep up with the outer planets (even if it did take the spectrum of an extrasolar world). Aware of what I post about here, I’m conscious this might be the last time I think to post about this telescope’s images. It’s easy enough even so to contemplate calendars of its nebula and galaxy images showing up in the future.
krpalmer: (Default)
Although aware another test flight of a space capsule to carry astronauts to the space station was approaching, it was still a surprise to look at the NASA site one day and see the Boeing Starliner had launched and made it to its destination. The last time that had been attempted, something had gone awry and the capsule had returned to Earth without ever managing to dock. A certain number of disparaging comments about “the establishment” followed, and in the time since that first test the Crew Dragon is now carrying (very) deep-pocketed ticket-buyers into space. Even so, for all that SpaceX has accomplished things a part of me remains cautious about becoming “too big a fan,” and seeing an alternative also being coaxed into working is appealing. I made a point of watching streaming coverage of the Starliner capsule parachuting down to the desert, and happened to recall impressions of a rather old book I’d found in my local library when young that had looked ahead to Apollo capsules managing to land in the desert once upon a time, if I’m remembering that right.
krpalmer: (Default)
My RSS reader pointed me to a news item that the Ingenuity mini-helicopter, still gathering enough charge to keep flying on Mars, has photographed the top half of the capsule that carried it and the bigger Perseverance rover into the atmosphere. Other Mars rovers have glimpsed cast-off hardware from their reentries and landings before (the item mentioned Perseverance had already spotted its crumpled parachute), but the aerial perspective was fascinating for all that the condition of the “backshell” shows how you need more than a parachute to make a soft landing on Mars. I can find some reassurance in Ingenuity showing its own perseverance on Mars, too.
krpalmer: (Default)
While I have been trying to look up “space news” every so often to keep up on a few ongoing things in my mind, an announcement the eighteen hexagonal mirrors of the James Webb Space Telescope had aligned on their target star surprised me when I first saw it in my regular newspaper. I went looking for more information on the sites I know to check, and now I noticed distant galaxies were beginning to appear in the test image too. It will be a few more months before the telescope completes its checkouts, but I suppose that’s something to try and keep an eye on along with the big and the small (regardless of how I’ve also just seen the big, as ever, attract a certain kind of “you can’t do anything right, can you?” criticism).
krpalmer: (Default)
A few months ago, I noticed the “followers” count on my Tumblr reaching a hundred, and as little weight I have to give to that it did make for something to post here. After that, though, I noticed the count drop below a hundred. That might be an intimation not all of the followers were “bots” latching on to random accounts for enigmatic yet nefarious purposes, but it might not too.

After a while, the count started creeping up again, and ticked over a hundred again. I told myself I had other things to post here all but ready to hand and surely didn’t have to make a pathetic boast again for the sake of inking in another date on the calendar here. Then, I double-checked the count, and just happened to notice someone I follow passing along that it’s been a year since Perseverance landed on Mars. More than that, the rover’s mini-helicopter is still working too. I’d had the impression the little solar panel above Ingenuity’s rotors was only good for stretching out its initial battery charge from Perseverance’s radioisotope thermal generator, so all in all I’m both surprised and impressed.
krpalmer: (Default)
As “post something every so often” started nudging me harder, I realised I didn’t seem to have any ideas to write about. While I have been working my way through a few things I thought I might comment on, I haven’t finished them yet. Not altogether satisfied with the last few posts I’ve made and remembering how the arid patch that had pushed me to sign up for Tumblr hit in a February, I went so far as to reconsider something I’d watched through an educational channel’s streaming service and dwelt on an unfortunate announcement reminding me of something I’d drifted away from a while ago. At the same time, though, I did get to wondering whether “expressing an opinion about everything taken in” is really that great, even if I might not be quite in a “get led along with ‘likes’ for the sake of selling online ads someone else makes money on” position.

Then, while going to a space news site to see how the checkouts of the James Webb Space Telescope are progressing, I happened to see an item about a search for extraterrestrial intelligence looking at the centre of our galaxy. The search didn’t turn up anything, and so long as that’s the case people will keep worrying about “technological civilizations expiring in short order.” Even so, and acknowledging it would be a foolish thing to let “science fiction” decide everything for actual science, I did happen to think of Vernor Vinge’s A Fire Upon the Deep, where towards the centre of the galaxy thought itself flickers out but “space opera” machinery works further out than we are. (I then thought of Poul Anderson’s earlier Brain Wave, although its “smart zones of space” aren’t in the same configuration.) So far as another predilection of Vinge and others goes (and acknowledging it might just be unproductive wishful thinking), I also got to thinking about “why not speculate about ‘advanced civilizations’ getting to a point where they aren’t detectable from a distance with our current technology?”
krpalmer: (Default)
Following the lead of my family, I signed up with the educational network of a province on the far edge of the country to watch some of their shows streaming. Just as I was sorting my way through the catalog, I was told about a documentary just added, if not quite a “new” one. Not that long ago I had heard about a period feature-length film about Apollo 11, which just happened to be available on YouTube. Not having got around to watching Moonwalk One until now, though, I was willing to hope more legitimate streaming would mean a better-quality print and picture.

It hasn’t been that long since I saw a newer Apollo 11 documentary at the movies (and then bought it on Blu-Ray), and while I’d heard its simple animations echoed those of Moonwalk One listening to the narration of the older movie had me appreciating again how the newer film had worked without its own narrator. Some of the footage, of course, was familiar enough, although it was interesting to see a tracking camera shot not cut up between the separation of the charred first stage and the jettisoning of the “interstage” ring and escape tower. There was also an extended sequence about making a space suit that showed just how much shiny mylar went into it underneath the standard white exterior. More than that, perhaps, there was also a sequence of world news suggesting that maybe everything wasn’t thought just fine in 1969.

I can admit that in starting the documentary I realised it would run for longer than the copy on YouTube; getting to its end I saw credits for a “director’s cut,” following a mere forty years after the landing. That did get me wondering just what had been added, although there’s enough yet to watch just on the educational network that I’m left wondering when I might make the comparison.
krpalmer: (Default)
When I noted the James Webb Space Telescope’s sunshield had been fully deployed, I knew the mirrors would be unfolded next. While I’d seen the comments the sunshield seemed to provoke more nervousness, there did still seem the chance for unfortunate complications in the following steps. Checking the updates again and again, though, I saw notices that the secondary mirror had moved into place, and then that the six hexagonal mirrors on the sides had swung out three at a time to join the twelve in the middle. That should have the telescope changed from the rectangular package on top of an Ariane 5 rocket to pretty much how it’s supposed to look, although I know the positions of the mirrors are still going to be adjusted and the telescope has to nudge itself up to the Earth-sun Lagrange point. There have been plenty of comments about how the telescope’s thrusters all point in one direction to keep from contaminating the mirrors and it can’t turn the other way or else the mirrors will wind up in sunlight. Still, with thoughts of the black-and-white covering that tore off Skylab during launch (but after the rocket had vanished in the clouds) to be replaced with improvised sunshades now pushed back into the past, I’m left hoping that this time the mirrors have been really proven to have been made right.
krpalmer: (Default)
I set my alarm for Christmas morning to get up in time to watch the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope. The people in the launch control room, of course, had to get up earlier (along with the people watching from the gallery, who all piled out the exit in the last minutes of the countdown to what I understand is an outdoors observation platform). Although the weather down in French Guiana was cloudy to the point that not much of the launch could be seen live, it seemed to go well. For all of that being a Christmas present of sorts before anything got opened at home, however, I knew a lot of unfolding remained as the telescope coasted out to the sun-Earth Lagrange point. Much had been said in the long build-up to the telescope’s launch about how everything has to work right because it’s going beyond current abilities to send anyone after it. (At the same time, I was stuck being conscious of those who, intent on offering no quarter to the space shuttle whatsoever, kept insisting it would have been cheaper to keep throwing away defective Hubble-type space telescopes and building new ones so long as they were launched by proper rockets.)

One of the big steps in unfolding the new space telescope was “sunshield tensioning,” and the announcement that would be delayed to gather information on how the machine was operating did seem like the sort of moment where certain people could start to let their worries run away on them. I waited, and there were announcements the first of five sunshield layers had been tensioned. After waiting some more, the announcements declared all five layers had worked, and things could move on to moving the mirrors into place in their shadow. That means there’s still the chance of anything happening, but fewer chances than before.
krpalmer: (europa)
After watching my way through “Star Wars Visions” I was intent on returning to my Blu-Ray saga box set. I did, though, pause to take in a Urusei Yatsura movie with the impression I was seeing it alongside the episodes of that series that had been on TV at the time of its premiere; to say more about that will have to wait for my year-end “quarterly review.” As for saying something about the six Star Wars movies I watched again, though, I am a bit conscious of my choices getting squeezed from multiple sides now. It was something to finish the movies just after reading the concluding instalment of [personal profile] matril’s long-running “Star Words” on my reading page, but I do suppose the best I can hope for from other people on that page is polite silence.

As I grappled with all of that and wondered what else I might post about “before too long,” I did happen to see a news item that a rich Japanese man had bought a ticket on a Soyuz launch to the space station. It’s been ten years since I bought my Star Wars Blu-Ray set (and a Blu-Ray player and an HDTV to watch it with), but twenty since this form of commercial spaceflight began. (I did try to allude to it back in a MSTing I wrote.) Maybe that made the news a bit easier to just sort of accept than the other commercial flights this year, although I also fear the relative anonymity of the ticket-buyer might have helped reduce reactions. As for Yusaku Maezawa’s follow-up plans to travel out to the moon, though, I did get to remembering an article in the Smithsonian’s Air & Space magazine about plans to send a Soyuz out that far, reprising the Zond missions of the late 1960s with people on board at last, that just seemed to evaporate in the end.
krpalmer: (Default)
Driving back from work yesterday, the short radio newscast I listen to mentioned the DART space probe was preparing to launch. I’d heard about that impending attempt to crash into an asteroid’s moonlet and alter the smaller space rock’s orbit. In knowing the plans were about to try and transition into reality, I did also think it might be a chance to get a post together to this journal. Ideas haven’t been coming together that fast in the weeks just past, and being able to comment again about something other than “lightweight entertainment” and “computer hobbies” did seem a little appealing.

The news item also mentioned a SpaceX rocket was going to launch the probe, which got my attention for all that I remain cautious about puffing up the company. Glancing at the NASA site revealed the rocket was “just” a Falcon 9, although Delta II rockets have sent landers to Mars. I also noticed its first stage was getting scorched, if not quite as blackened as some have become.

When I went to the NASA site the next morning I saw DART had managed to launch, but there was no mention there of whether the first stage had used up all its fuel and been expended to boost an interplanetary payload. I eventually resorted to Wikipedia and saw a note about the stage landing on one of SpaceX’s winkingly named barges; it at least hadn’t done what still might outrage my sensibilities a bit and cancelled out its downrange velocity to return to shore. Poking further into Wikipedia’s coverage of the Falcon 9 (although there is that matter of “maybe you could do still do with verification from an external source”) I found some notes about first stages being turned around in a month, seeming proof at last they need less refurbishment than the space shuttles wound up requiring if not how much all of it costs.
krpalmer: (Default)
The morning after scraping together a post that might amount to an empty boast just for the sake of saying something here “before too long,” the preview blurb on Astronomy Picture of the Day had me thinking a launch I’d known was coming up without quite being sure when might have happened. I went to the main NASA site and saw the Lucy space probe had indeed launched for the Trojan asteroids held in the Lagrange points of Jupiter’s orbit (familiar enough points for anyone with a reasonable awareness of Gundam).

Lucy will need years and several gravitational boosts from Earth flybys before it gets up to the first group of Trojan asteroids, so it shouldn’t matter that much that I was a few days late noticing this news. The thought I might have been distracted by the repeated stunt of William Shatner and three other people being rocketed to extreme altitudes last week and missed a chance to say something a bit more significant here might have been a bit of a reproach even so. In pondering this automated mission being sold as “the investigation of ‘space fossils’” and its name coming from the ancient skeleton as something of a distraction from that, I suppose I did confront this “Lucy” not being quite connected to the Apollo 10 call signs “Charlie Brown” and “Snoopy.”

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910111213 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 12:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios