krpalmer: (Default)
[personal profile] krpalmer
I did happen to hear SpaceX was getting closer to its own "return to flight" launch, and still using its own Falcon 9 rocket. In taking in that coverage, though, I also began to gather there would be another attempt to bring the first stage in for a soft touchdown, except that this time it would head all the way back to Cape Canaveral. While trying to make a precise lineup with a barge, however large, out in the ocean didn't seem to have worked before, I could still remember how on first hearing the thought of a first stage boosting the second to sufficient velocity but still saving enough fuel to cancel its "downrange" velocity had sort of outraged my sensibilities.

After hearing of a few launch postponements, though, I got around to checking the NASA site itself, and saw a Twitter post congratulating SpaceX on its feat. I suppose I've got to accept the accomplishment. While I've heard questions about how easy it'll be to start refurbishing a kerosene-burning rocket to fly again and I know the space shuttle wound up needing a lot more maintenance than it was supposed to, that SpaceX has managed to work through problems somehow has more of an impact on me than a "private" company coming up with stunning solutions the first time around just because it's "private enterprise."
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

August 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 8th, 2025 04:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios